Thursday, January 31, 2013

TRUTH OF MARRIAGE



The Truth of Marriage



“The basic way in which any society is built depends on marriage. Whenever two people give themselves to each other and, between them, give life to children, this touches the holiness, the mystery of human existence, which goes beyond the realm of what I can control and dispose of. I simply do not belong to myself alone. There is a divine mystery within each person. That is why the association of husband and wife is regarded within the religious realm, the sphere of the sacred, of being answerable before God…this fully corresponds to human dignity. Human life is not an experiment. This is not a commercial contract, but a surrender of myself to another person. Only in the form of a love that is entire and unreserved is the self-giving of one person to another commensurate with the essence of man.

“We must think of love as suffering. Only if we are ready to endure it as suffering and thus ever again to accept each other and once again to take the other to ourselves, only then can a life-long partnership develop. If, on the contrary, we say when we get to the critical point, I want to avoid that, and we separate, then what we are really renouncing is the true opportunity that is to be found in man and woman being turned toward each other and in the reality of love.” (Pope Benedict XVI, in Benedict, Ignatius Press 2012, pp. 290, 295).

We may consider the following. Jesus calls us his bride, and he uses marriage as a picture of his relationship to the Church and to each one of us as his followers. He personally washes his church. Then there is the “S” word – submission. Submission does not imply inferiority. God made Eve out of the side of Adam, to be bone of his bone and flesh of his flesh – his equal – his companion.  Submission does not imply inferiority in any way. It is a voluntary reliance on another in perfect trust. In fact, the Apostle Paul says that we are all to submit to each other. Wives to submit to husbands, husbands to wives, and both to Christ.

Further, husbands are to be the leaders of the family, the pastors at home. And men are to love their wives as Christ loves the Church, and even died for her. Correspondingly, wives are co-pastors to their families. Leadership at home is primarily a spiritual responsibility. Consult Eph. 5, 21 – 23:  “This is a great sacrament, and I refer it to the love of Christ for the Church” (St. Paul’s Letter to the Ephesians, 5, 21).  The sacrament (“mysterion”) is the salvific plan realised in Christ. Marriage is inserted into the wider context of Christ’s salvific work, thereby having itself a redemptive function. God’s plan (“mysterion”) is historical, Christological and ecclesial. So is marriage. Husband and wife make present Christ’s love for the Church, and Christ’s love for the Church makes present God’s love for mankind.

The conjugal love of Christian spouses is one of the specifics of the divine salvific reality. That is, marriage is the specific venue of the reconciling ministry of Christ. Christian marriage is inserted into the sphere of redemption. The fundamental economy of Christianity, the fruitful unity of Christ and his church, is realised anew in every Christian marriage. Since a symbol not only points to but also effects (brings about) the reality, we may say that Christ, as it were, is waiting for Christian spouses to love one another in order that through them he could express his love for the Church. Christ is “enabled” by spousal love to act upon the world. By their love, married partners place the sign of Christ’s love for the Church. Christian marriage is the specific venue of Christ’s action of restoring harmony in the world and creation.

May God richly bless your marriage!

 

 

 

WOMAN OF FAITH


Woman of Faith


Woman of Faith

What is Faith?  Faith is, first of all, God’s action on us. God gives himself to you. He has faith in you since he created you with great hopes for your future. As Jesus says, “You did not choose me, I chose you. I chose you because I believe in you, that you will go out and bear fruit, fruit that will last.” One day, two thousand years ago, God chose a maiden of marriageable age and addressed her as “Hail, favoured one. I have chosen you because I see a great future, a great future that will arise from you womb, and radiate to the whole world, and bring the whole world back to me, the source of all good.”  You remember how Jesus once said: “When I am lifted up I shall draw all men and women to myself.”  When the faith of God entered into Mary, that very faith empowered her to answer her great “Yes” with a complete hope for the future. She would be faithful, strong and reliable. The first among the disciples, she is the one whose discipleship never fails. She is the woman who does not deny, does not betray nor leave her child and run away.

            In Pope Paul VI’s exhortation, “Marialis Cultus”, he noted “a certain dissatisfaction for the cult of Mary and a difficulty in taking her as a model for today” because of the changed circumstances. Modern women do not live in the same world as women of the Middle East at the time of Christ. To this Pope Paul replies that Our Lady is proposed as a model not for her particular (cultural) life-style but for her faith. So Mary is the type (model) of the disciple, and as such for all men as well as women.
            In the Gospels Mary is portrayed as a women of faith, who sings a psalm of praise, known as the Magnificat, upon meeting her cousin Elizabeth in the land of Judah (Luke, 1, 46 –55). The song reflects traditional Hebrew parallelism and metre common in the Psalms and expresses Mary’s belief in and obedience to God. She praises God for exercising divine justice and compassion on behalf of the lowly, both for herself and for Israel as “God’s servant”. With the covenant reference to Abraham, Mary claims this moment as an act in continuity with God’s promises and blessings in the past. Her obedience puts her alongside the leaders of Israel; not only Abraham but also Moses and David. The Magnificat is modelled on Hannah’s (Samson’s mother) song in 1 Samuel 2, 1 – 10, who prayed and said, “My heart exults in the Lord, my strength is exalted in my God.” It preserves the depth of Jewish prayer and is marked by humility and trust in God’s power to save.
            John’s account of the wedding at Cana (John 2, 1 – 13) provides the only Gospel account of a conversation between the adult Jesus and Mary. Although brief, it rings true as an exchange between a Jewish mother and her son. When Mary asks Jesus to provide more wine, his initial response appears rather tetchy. “What concern is that to you and me?” Jews, says the Talmud, often have their feet in the dust but their heads in the stars.
According to St. Augustine (Explaining John’s Gospel, 8.9), Mary is the mother of Jesus’ weakness, not his strength. He makes it clear he will do the miracle but not because of her – his divinity has its own aims, connected with the hour of death to which he steers under the Father’s guidance. She is not privy to that higher mission. The Father controls Jesus’ hour, and Jesus is obedient to him. “Before he does perform this sign, Jesus must make clear his refusal of Mary’s intervention; she cannot have any role in his ministry; his signs must reflect his Father’s sovereignty and not a human or family agency” (Raymond Brown, The Gospel according to John, Vol. I, p. 109).
            However, Jesus, like most Jewish sons, fulfils the biblical command to respect his mother, and obeys her. The wine appears, justifying Mary’s faith in him when she tells the servants the hauntingly unforgettable line: “Do whatever he tells you.”
            Our lives are to sparkle and dance and lure others into the arms of God. Mary’s faith life is a dance to imitate, but the steps are ours to learn, and no dance is the same. What is more important is to grow up, walk on our own two feet, and run after the Spirit’s gifts. A mother’s love stretches us and makes us imitate the love we have been given so graciously. Mother Mary saw that “the Child grew in stature and strength.”
Mary is the Virgin daughter of Israel who bears a Son, who says “Yes” to the God who calls her to carry God’s own Son and birth him in our world. She the lowly handmaid who will be called “Blessed” by succeeding generations, she has the Faith. Her will is to do “the command of the eternal God (Rom 16, 26), even if it means walking the hard road from Nazareth of Galilee to the place of the Skull outside Jerusalem. She saw her Son heading for disaster, but by faith and steadfast loyalty she walked by his side. From the “maid of Nazareth” she will become the “woman on the hill.” And we, men and women of faith, will walk with her from Bethlehem to Calvary. We shall stand and contemplate this magnificent woman on the hill, the woman of faith who replied to the angel Gabriel: “Be it done unto me according to your word.” Rest your eyes upon this brave Mother standing by her crucified Son.
She remembers saying to herself, when he was twelve and already about his Father’s business, “He’s not my little boy anymore.”

Rivulets of blood beading the earth beneath the Cross.
Deep down inside she knew that her little boy was born to die.
Why should she be there?
But this was hers. This cross upon the hill. He had not sheltered her from pain nor ever asked that she not be free to learn anguish. She had learned that.
He had not been fretful or concerned to throw around her soft protection, guarding her against a share in him. He’d spoken truth to her. He’d not been reticent or sparing.
He’d not held her unadmitted to the full acceptance, never.
She had heard what Simeon could say, and at the moment when she’d found the Child that had been lost, he had not consoled her with a gentle paraphrase of futures, eased away from what the days should be. And he’d not softened any loneliness when Nazareth was ended.
She was free to sorrow and not withheld. She could be eager, insistent, insatiate, for this was hers to take, her own. And by a long inclusion granted her, she’d known she’d need not ever turn from grief
Of all the spreading earth this was the one place she might stand with him.
She could be near. He would not deny her now; he’d not forbid her come here.
This was hers, her life, her dignity, her choice, the essence of her heart’s significance, the sum and substance of her existence, the end of her being.
She bore the right to be here, standing under the claim of being the “Woman.”
She could penetrate to this, this small and inner-concentrated anguish.
She could stand here. This was hers.
And he would only look, expecting her.
“Woman, here is your son.”
“Son, your mother.”
Love never looked like this.                      

The woman of the hill has become the woman of our hearts. As the Beloved disciple John took Mary into his own, we too take her home and give her pride of place, even though we humbly admit that our home is not always in order. The brokenness of sin, the evil of destructive attitudes towards through neighbour, and the lust of the flesh; all these destroy our homes and make them unfit for our Blessed Mother to live in. But today we shall offer our brokenness to Mary, the Mother of Health, trusting that she will transform it into something beautiful for God. For health does not mean physical fitness of muscular power;        rather, in the mind of Mary it means the capacity of surrendering our whole selves to God, whatever be our state of health, whether we lie on a bed of pain, or handicapped by injury or ailment or mental torture, we can offer ourselves to God through Mary. That is health. And those who can surrender selves to God are, indeed, in very good health.

 

                                                                                             
        Prayer: O gracious Lady, beloved Mother of God and our loving Mother, from where shall we learn Faith if not from you, sweet Maiden who said “Yes” to God’s invitation to carry the Saviour in your virginal womb, and nurse him at your breast? You followed him with a mother’s concern right through his ministry, accompanied him on his cross-laden ascent to Calvary, and became the sorrowing woman on the hill. Through faith and steadfast loyalty you treasured the mysteries of Jesus in your heart, and have made them ours, so that whatever happened to you and Jesus must happen to us: a holy life and happy death in God and community in him forever. Amen.
{composed by me on 11th. August 2012}



EVANGELISE THIS FREEDOM


“Evangelise this Freedom”


-         Cardinal M. Martini

Pope Benedict XVI is at pains to show that the teaching of Vatican II is not a break from the past but is implicit in some of what had gone before. The Council did not reinvent Catholicism but renewed it. Fifty years on from the Council, the Holy Father hails its documents on religious freedom (“Dignitatis Humanae”) and on relations with other faiths (“Nostra Aetate”) as Vatican II’s greatest achievements. Their riches are still being unpacked today, even though they were considered minor documents as compared to the great pastoral constitution “Gaudium et Spes” (Church in the Modern World).           

The straight forward reply of Peter and the Apostles to the Sanhedrin, “We prefer to obey God rather than men” laid down the basic claim that the state could neither decide on the truth nor prescribe any kind of worship. By its very nature, the Christian Faith demanded freedom of religious belief and practice without prejudice to the internal ordering of state. The world owes it to Christianity birthing the principle of religious freedom.

Thirteen years after the Council, it was providentially  relevant that Pope John Paul II hailed from Marxist Poland where freedom of religion was heartlessly trampled on, not to speak of the bitterness of Nazism that he had also tasted as a young man. It was he, together with some bishops from Communist countries, who were wary about state qualifications on the freedom of religion. The Council fathers had conceded that citizens exercising religious freedom had to pay due regard to pubic order and safety. When necessary, though, the state could constrain freedom of religion in order to safeguard the rights of all citizens and to maintain public order and decency. Hence the Council fathers had to navigate a tense middle course between those who insisted on the primacy of truth and those apprehensive of the state overstepping its competence. We return to the old problem that is ever new: what to do with our freedom? In 1993, the late Cardinal Mara Martini told Jesuit students in Rome: “More people today have the gift of freedom than ever before in history, and my task is to evangelise this freedom.”

The other document, extolled by Pope Benedict, is “Nostra Aetate” that treats about the Church’s relations with non-Christian religions. It has powerfully impacted the Church’s outlook and every department of its activity. Strongly influenced by the horrific memories of the Holocaust, the Council’s original intention was to issue a statement on the Church’s relationship with the Jews, but in the process of discussion and redaction it was realised that basic values were becoming increasingly operative. These were instigated by the contentions of the bishops of the Arabic continent. Why not make a similar statement about relations with Muslims? It also emerged that consideration was also due to Hinduism and Buddhism and to religion in general. Interestingly, there was no condemnation of atheism! Then the dynamic led to the feasibility and, indeed, the necessity of dialogue with and receptivity to the insights and values of other faith persuasions, since all inspirations are slated to the enrichment of the human condition. It was becoming increasingly apparent that the scope of all the common endeavour and responsibility was constantly expanding. Today the need for introspection is increasingly emphasised, especially in the exercise of authority and the requirements of the personal vis-à-vis the institutional, the local as confronting the universal. Listening to the Spirit is an ongoing task that calls for humility and collective meditation.

The positive scope of common endeavour began to take shape and broaden out. The Council’s bishops admitted themselves as apprentices of the Holy Spirit, supreme master of the school of reciprocal collaboration, and as witnesses to the Christian faith at the service of the Word. The Spirit was their supreme enabler not to found another Church but to deepen their understanding of their potential for the renewal of humanity.



Tuesday, January 1, 2013

BIBLE QUIZ


Bible Quiz


1.       Name the mountain on which Noah’s Ark came to rest.

Ararat (in Armenia).

2.       Which two birds did Noah flush after the deluge?

Raven and dove.

3.       Name the mother of king Solomon.

Bathsheba.

4.       Name the father of king David.

Jesse.

 King David had two wives, AHINOAM and A-----L.

ABIGAIL.

5.       Name the first son of Abraham.

Ishmael.

6.       What did Adam say when he first saw Eve?

“This is indeed bone of my bone and flesh of my flesh.”

7.       What two things lepers in the Old Testament had to do?

Cover their faces and shout “unclean, unclean.”

8.       How old was Noah when the Ark was launched?

200 years!

9.       What does Pentateuch mean?

The first five books of the Old Testament.

10.   What was the writing on the wall of king Belshazzar?

Mene Mene Tekel  Upharsin (or Pares).

11.   Which Psalm begins with “The Lord is my shepherd”?

Psalm 22 or 23 (both correct)

12.   Who danced before king Herod for the head of John the Baptist?

Salome.

13.   Name the three Wise Men from the East.

Melchior, Gaspar and Balthazar.

14.   What is the meaning of “Boanerges”?

Sons of thunder (James and John).

15.   Jesus looked up and said: (three words).

“Zacheus, come down.”

16.   Were the 10 lepers cured immediately by Jesus?

No; on their way to the priests.

17.   How many pigs hurtled down the hill in Mk 5, 13?

About two thousand.

18.   How many fish were caught in Jn 21, 11? One hundred and fifty-three.

        20. On which mount was Jesus transfigured?      Mount Tabor.

21.  What does the name Golgotha mean?  Place of the skull.

22. What is the meaning of the word Pentecost?

       50th. Day.

23. “Is anyone sick among you? Call the elders and let them pray over him.”  Where do you find this passage? 

Letter of St. James.

24. What is the full name of the betrayer of Jesus?

      Judas Iscariot.

25. Where did St. John, the Beloved disciple die?

       Island of Patmos.

26. Was the first Christian martyr a priest/deacon/lay person?

      Stephen the deacon.

 

Some fun questions:

1.       What was Adam and Eve’s phone number?       281 (two ate one).

2.       Why was Samson a great entertainer?  He brought the house down.

3.       Where was Moses when the lights went out?  In his skin/in the dark/in his dark skin.

4.       Why did the elephants take so long to enter the ark? They had to pack their trunks.

5.       Why did the centipedes take so long to enter the ark? They had to wear their shoes.

6.       Who came fourth in the human race?   Lazarus.

7.       Is Epistle the wife of Apostle?

 

 

 

BIBLE AND HEALTH


 

 

 

THE BIBLE AND HEALTH SERVICE

 

Fr. Mervyn Carapiet

The Bible’s Influence


            Two great factors have influenced modern (especially Western) medicine. One influence can be traced back to the classical Greek ideal. The other great influence has been the Bible. The classical Greek ideal is enshrined in the Hippocratic tradition, specially reinterpreted since the Renaissance. However, under the tutelage of Plato and Aristotle, the Greek medical mentality became pragmatic and self-centred. For instance, unwanted and weak babies were exposed, and the chronically ill neglected.

            The biblical tradition provided the corrective and leitmotiv. There is a transcendent God from whom we have received the world and our bodies in trust, and to whom, therefore, we are finally answerable. Faith implies accountability. This and the perception that every human being is destined for God produce the profound respect for the dignity and value of the individual created in the image of God. “Love your neighbour as yourself” (Lev 19,18) and the Golden Rule, “Do unto others...”(Mt 7, 12) sum up the responsibilities of Jewish and Christian faith in people’s relations with one another. From the standpoint of health care, this was admirably summed up in the prayer of the great Jewish physician, Maimonides (1135-1204 CE), “May I never see in my patient anything else than a fellow creature in pain.”

            The commandment to love is not an abstract principle, but a concrete demand, as illustrated in Jesus’ graphic parables, like the Good Samaritan. It is so recognisable, that the hearer/reader becomes a doer in his own context, feeling himself responsible even for what does not pertain to the strictly circumscribed terrain of his professional commitment. When someone has been educated in the Christian tradition, the narrative’s confrontation can often unexpectedly lead to creative initiatives originally thought impossible. The people in Jesus’ day did not attribute illness to diseases, germs and viruses, but rather to evil spirits (cf. Luke 4,33; 6,18; 7,21; 8,2,29; 9.39; 11,4; 13,11). Luke is at pains to present Jesus as one filled with the Holy Spirit from his very conception (1,15,17,35,80; 3,16,22; 4,1; 14,18). In his healing ministry, Jesus engages in a power struggle with demonic forces. In this struggle, the Holy Spirit, who fills Jesus, always prevails. Jesus’ healing power is evidence of a new in-breaking of the reign of God (Luke 11,20). This is evident, however, only to those who have faith.

            Such biblical narrative-precepts spurred the Church on to establishing hospitals for the sick, refuges for the blind, mentally ill and outcasts due to diseases, and dispensaries for the poor. At a much later stage, this concern led to missionary work in conjunction with, though not distinct from, evangelisation.

            In providing a moral basis for such development, the Bible has given to modern medicine a great deal more that it might now care to acknowledge. Even though the movement of secularisation separated the professional from the clerical, the centrality of respect for the person has become enshrined in modern medical codes, such as the Geneva Convention Code of Ethics (1948) and the Helsinki Convention (1964) of the World Medical Association.

 

Advancing Secularisation


            There were, however, adverse indications. As a result of certain interpretations, the Bible’s influence on medicine was not always positive. Lacking the notion of secondary causes, people tended to see illness as a divine punitive visitation for wrongdoing. Jesus corrected this slant on at least one occasion. There are but a few references to physicians in the Bible and these are uncomplimentary (cf. Mark 5,25-26; Luke 8,43), except for the allusion to Luke, “the beloved physician” (Col 4,14) and in Sirach 38, 1-15, where the reader is exhorted to “honour physicians for their services.” Even in these passages the emphasis is on the need for confession of sin before any true healing could take place, and on the role of God as healer. One may recall the much later dictum of Ambraise Paré (1510-1590): “I treated the patient, but God healed him.”

            In Israel ritual and religion dominated the field of medicine and healing. Physical disease made one ritually impure, and any healing was certified by a priest, not a doctor. Codes of hygiene were set within a religious framework. With poor perception of secondary causes, it was God alone who “sent” disease and disaster as a punishment for misdeeds; alternatively, he rewarded the good with health and well-being (cf. Exodus 15,26; Deuteronomy 7,12-15). Many of these ideas carried over into early and medieval Christianity. Medical treatment was minimal as compared to prayer and fasting in order to chasten the individual. This attitude can still be discerned in the discussion on A.I.D.S.  God’s continuous dialogue with us now assumes profound meaning. Could it be that A.I.D.S. is God’s judgement on a rebellious and salacious world and that here is an opportunity to assert traditional morality at a stroke?  People who talk like this may well be authoritarian and punitive figures seeking to control human behaviour by intimidation and threats of retribution. Others say that love and compassion are integral to God’s dialogue with us. Only love and compassion help realise the Kingdom. Both religion and science need to learn from this new situation.

            From the Renaissance onwards, medicine and theology drifted increasingly apart. Medicine developed on empirical lines of experimentation and conclusions, more and risky ventures and openness to new possibilities. Nevertheless, there always remained in Christianity  a healing ministry that still draws on the capital, albeit residual, of biblical values. In general, this has not been considered in competition with orthodox medicine but rather as complementary to it. Some more recent developments in healing ministries, derived from biblical literature, however, seem to be an exercise of a pre- scientific worldview, and will inevitably be in conflict with modern medical practice.

 

BIBLE EXPLAINED BY KIDS


Bible Humour

The Bible as explained by a grammar school class

Reading and studying the Bible is serious work, so we decided to present some Bible humour taken from essays of kids in grammar school. Here they are:

"In the beginning, which occurred near the start, there was nothing but God, darkness, and some gas. The Bible says, 'The Lord thy God is one,' but I think He must be a lot older than that. Anyway, God said, 'Give me a light!' and someone did. Then God made the world. He split the Adam and made Eve. Adam and Eve were naked, but they weren't embarrassed because mirrors hadn't been invented yet. Adam and Eve disobeyed God by eating one bad apple, so they were driven from the Garden of Eden. Not sure what they were driven in though, because they didn't have cars."

"Adam and Eve had a son, Cain, who hated his brother as long as he was Abel. Pretty soon all of the early people died off, except for Methuselah, who lived to be like a million or something."

"One of the next important people was Noah, who was a good guy, but one of his kids was kind of a ham. Noah built a large boat and put his family and some animals on it. He asked some other people to join him, but they said they would have to take a rain check."

"After Noah came Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. Jacob was more famous than his brother, Esau, because Esau sold Jacob his birthmark in exchange for some pot roast. Jacob had a son named Joseph who wore a really loud sports coat."

"Another important Bible guy is Moses, whose real name was Charlton Heston. Moses led the Israel Lights out of Egypt and away from the evil Pharaoh after God sent ten plagues on Pharaoh's people. These plagues included frogs, mice, lice, bowels, and no cable. God fed the Israel Lights every day with manicotti. Then He gave them His top Ten Commandments. These include don't lie, cheat, smoke, dance, or covet your neighbour's bottom (the Bible uses a bad word for bottom that I'm not supposed to say. But my Dad uses it sometimes when he talks about the President). Oh, yeah, I just thought of one more: Humour they father and they mother."

"One of Moses' best helpers was Joshua who was the first Bible guy to use spies. Joshua fought the battle of Geritol and the fence fell over on the town."

"After Joshua came David. He got to be king by killing a giant with a slingshot. He had a son named Solomon who had about 300 wives and 500 porcupines. My teacher says he was wise, but that doesn't sound very wise to me. After Solomon there were a bunch of major league prophets. One of these was Jonah, who was swallowed by a big whale and then barfed up on the shore."

"There were also some minor league prophets, but I guess we don't have to worry about them."

"After the Old Testament came the New Testament. Jesus is the star of the New Testament. He was born in Bethlehem in a barn. (I wish I had > been born in a barn, too, because my mom is always saying to me, 'Close the door! Were you born in a barn' It would be nice to say, 'As a matter of fact, I was.')"

"During His life, Jesus had many arguments with sinners like the Pharisees and the Republicans. Jesus also had twelve opossums. The worst one was Judas Asparagus. Judas was so evil that they named a terrible vegetable after him."

"Jesus was a great man. He healed many leopards and even preached to some Germans on the Mount. But the Republicans and all those guys put Jesus on trial before Pontius the Pilot. Pilot didn't stick up for Jesus. He just washed his hands instead."

"Anyways, Jesus died for our sins, then came back to life again. He went up to Heaven but will be back at the end of the Aluminum. His return is foretold in the book of Revolution."

 

THE BLIND MAN



By Nate Manning, a junior interdisciplinary major from Middleville, Mich.

SCRIPTURE: John 9:1-41 (NRSV)
Scroll down for complete Scripture.

DEVOTIONAL:
When I read today’s passage, I think of the beautiful song written by John Newton. Amazing Grace has been sung in churches all over the world since it was penned in the 1760s. The particular line that stands out is “how precious did that grace appear, the hour I first believed.” Do you remember the hour that you first believed? Do you remember when you first understood the need for a savior and found hope and love in Jesus Christ? I know when I first believed I could not handle it. I couldn’t hold it in. I wanted everyone to know. Why does it seem so easy to share what Christ has done for us when we first believe, but as we grow “closer” to God, we seem to lose that fire that we had to share what Christ has done?

The blind man in this story had this boldness. He knew how precious this love was from Christ. He understood that he may not be the most popular man because of his decision to believe Christ. He had to take a risk. The blind man’s parents would not even tell the Pharisees that he was healed by Jesus. They knew they could be ridiculed. The blind man did not care about this. He knew he was blind, and then he could see.

Jesus says in Matthew 10:24 that he did not come to bring peace to the world but a sword. This story of the blind man is an example of this claim. A miracle was performed on the man but many people were so confident that he could not be the messiah. This caused great conflict that eventually led to his death. When Jesus touches us, we need to be bold like the blind man, even if this means stirring up some conflict, because this world is a world of sin. We should be the salt in the world as Jesus teaches in the Sermon on the Mount.

SCRIPTURE: John 9:1-41 (NRSV)

1As he walked along, he saw a man blind from birth. 2His disciples asked him, “Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?” 3Jesus answered, “Neither this man nor his parents sinned; he was born blind so that God’s works might be revealed in him. 4We must work the works of him who sent me while it is day; night is coming when no one can work. 5As long as I am in the world, I am the light of the world.” 6When he had said this, he spat on the ground and made mud with the saliva and spread the mud on the man’s eyes, 7saying to him, “Go, wash in the pool of Siloam” (which means Sent). Then he went and washed and came back able to see. 8The neighbors and those who had seen him before as a beggar began to ask, “Is this not the man who used to sit and beg?” 9Some were saying, “It is he.” Others were saying, “No, but it is someone like him.” He kept saying, “I am the man.” 10But they kept asking him, “Then how were your eyes opened?” 11He answered, “The man called Jesus made mud, spread it on my eyes, and said to me, “Go to Siloam and wash.’ Then I went and washed and received my sight.” 12They said to him, “Where is he?” He said, “I do not know.” 13They brought to the Pharisees the man who had formerly been blind. 14Now it was a sabbath day when Jesus made the mud and opened his eyes. 15Then the Pharisees also began to ask him how he had received his sight. He said to them, “He put mud on my eyes. Then I washed, and now I see.” 16Some of the Pharisees said, “This man is not from God, for he does not observe the sabbath.” But others said, “How can a man who is a sinner perform such signs?” And they were divided. 17So they said again to the blind man, “What do you say about him? It was your eyes he opened.” He said, “He is a prophet.” 18The Jews did not believe that he had been blind and had received his sight until they called the parents of the man who had received his sight 19and asked them, “Is this your son, who you say was born blind? How then does he now see?” 20His parents answered, “We know that this is our son, and that he was born blind; 21but we do not know how it is that now he sees, nor do we know who opened his eyes. Ask him; he is of age. He will speak for himself.” 22His parents said this because they were afraid of the Jews; for the Jews had already agreed that anyone who confessed Jesus to be the Messiah would be put out of the synagogue. 23Therefore his parents said, “He is of age; ask him.” 24So for the second time they called the man who had been blind, and they said to him, “Give glory to God! We know that this man is a sinner.” 25He answered, “I do not know whether he is a sinner. One thing I do know, that though I was blind, now I see.” 26They said to him, “What did he do to you? How did he open your eyes?” 27He answered them, “I have told you already, and you would not listen. Why do you want to hear it again? Do you also want to become his disciples?” 28Then they reviled him, saying, “You are his disciple, but we are disciples of Moses. 29We know that God has spoken to Moses, but as for this man, we do not know where he comes from.” 30The man answered, “Here is an astonishing thing! You do not know where he comes from, and yet he opened my eyes. 31We know that God does not listen to sinners, but he does listen to one who worships him and obeys his will. 32Never since the world began has it been heard that anyone opened the eyes of a person born blind. 33If this man were not from God, he could do nothing.” 34They answered him, “You were born entirely in sins, and are you trying to teach us?” And they drove him out. 35Jesus heard that they had driven him out, and when he found him, he said, “Do you believe in the Son of Man?” 36He answered, “And who is he, sir? Tell me, so that I may believe in him.” 37Jesus said to him, “You have seen him, and the one speaking with you is he.” 38He said, “Lord, I believe.” And he worshiped him. 39Jesus said, “I came into this world for judgment so that those who do not see may see, and those who do see may become blind.” 40Some of the Pharisees near him heard this and said to him, “Surely we are not blind, are we?” 41Jesus said to them, “If you were blind, you would not have sin. But now that you say, “We see,’ your sin remains.


 

COVENANT THEOLOGY


 

Covenant & Testament: What is a Covenant? What Does the Bible Say?

By Austin Cline, About.com
What is a Covenant or Testament?:
The Hebrew term for covenant is berit, meaning “to bond or fetter.” It is translated into the Greek as syntheke, “binding together” or diatheke, “will, testament.” In the Bible, then, a covenant is a relationship based upon mutual commitments. It typically involves promises, obligations, and rituals. The terms testament and covenant can be used interchangeably, though covenant tends to be used for the relationship between Jews and God.
Covenants in the Bible:
The idea of covenant or testament is usually seen as a relation between God and humanity, but in the Bible there are examples of purely secular covenants: between leaders like Abraham and Abimelech (Gen 21:22-32) or between and king and his people like David and Israel (2 Sam 5:3). Despite their political nature, though, such covenants were always thought of as being overseen by a deity who would enforce its provisions. Blessings accrue to those who are faithful, curses to those who aren’t.
Covenant with Abraham:
The Abrahamic covenant of Genesis 15 is one where God promises Abraham land, innumerable descendants, and an ongoing, special relationship between those descendants and God. Nothing is asked for in return — neither Abraham nor his descendants “owe” God anything in exchange for the land or the relationship. Circumcision is expected as a sign of this covenant, but not as a payment.
Mosaic Covenent at Sianai with the Hebrews:
Some covenants which God is depicted as having enacted with humans are “everlasting” in the sense that there is no “human side” of the bargain which people must uphold lest the covenant end. The Mosaic covenant with the Hebrews at Sinai, as described in Deuteronomy, is a heavily conditioned one because the continuation of this covenant is dependent on the Hebrews faithfully obeying God and doing their duties. Indeed, all the laws are now divinely ordained, such that violations are now sins.
Covenant with David:
The Davidic covenant of 2 Samuel 7 is one where God promises a permanent dynasty of kings on the throne of Israel from David’s lineage. As with the Abrahamic covenant, nothing is asked for in return — unfaithful kings may be punished and criticized, but the Davidic line would not be ended because of this. The Davidic covenant was popular as it promised continuing political stability, secure worship at the Temple, and a peaceful life for the people.
Universal Covenant with Noah:
One of the covenants described in the Bible between God and humans is the “universal” covenant after the end of the Flood. Noah is the primary witness to it, but the promise not to again destroy life on such a scale is made to all humans and all other life on the planet.
Ten Commandments as Covenant Treaty:
It has been suggested by some scholars that the Ten Commandments is best understood by comparing it to some of the treaties written during the same time period. Rather than a list of laws, the commandments are in this view actually an agreement between God and his chosen people, the Hebrews. The relationship between the Jews and God is thus at least as much legal as it is personal. Read More...
New Testament (Covenant) of the Christians:
There are a variety of examples which the early Christians had to draw from when developing their own covenant beliefs. The dominant conception of covenant tended to rely mostly on the Abrahamic and Davidic models, where humans didn’t have to do anything in order to “deserve” or retain God’s grace. They didn’t have anything to uphold, they just had to accept what God was offering.
Old Testament vs. New Testament:
In Christianity, the concept of a testament came to be used to designate the “old” covenant with the Jews (Old Testament) and the “new” covenant with all of humanity through the sacrificial death of Jesus (New Testament). Jews, naturally, object to their scriptures being referred to as the “old” testament because for them, their covenant with God is current and relevant — not a historical relic, as implied by the Christian terminology.
What is Covenant Theology?:
Developed by the Purians, Covenant Theology is an attempt to reconcile two apparently exclusive doctrines: the doctrine that only the elect can or will be saved and the doctrine that God is perfectly just. After all, if God is just, why doesn’t God allow anyone to be saved and instead only elects a few? According to the Puritans, God’s “Covenant of Grace” for us means that while we are not able to have faith in God on our own, God can give us the ability - if we make use of that and do have faith, then we will be saved. This is supposed to eliminate the idea of a God who arbitrarily sends some people to heave and some to hell, but it replaces it with an idea of a God who arbitrarily uses divine power to give some people the ability to have faith but not to others. The Puritans also never worked out just how a person was to tell if they were one of the elect or not.
Advertisement
Advertisement

About.com Special Features

  • Summer Fun to School Success

    The best of the summer season, plus preparing to get back in the classroom routine.
  • Quick and Healthy Meals

    Check out these recipes and ideas to balance your family's nutrition with your busy schedule.
  • A Smarter Future

    Get tips to help finance your education, excel in the classroom, and advance your career.
  • Countdown to College

    Expert advice on how to pack for college, make new friends on campus, and succeed in class.