UNDERSTANDING
HOME
Fr. Mervyn Carapiet
Home. It is a magical word that resonates with all
of us. Even those from broken homes, or homes that no longer exist, there is
still something in the idea that is sought after. Home is that place
where we are meant to be safe, nurtured, known for who we are, to freely live
and love.
Home’s
universal appeal populates culture. Take Me Home, Country
Road, Home on the Range and I’ll Be Home for Christmas are
a few songs that invoke the theme. Movies and literature end
happily with protagonists, like Odysseus, finally going home. The entire
goal of the American pass-time of baseball is to be safe at home.
YouTube videos of joyful homecomings fill up our social media feeds and we
spend a lot of money constructing and decorating our own houses, turning
them into Home Sweet Home.
Our homes are the great theatre where the drama of
our lives unfolds, as G.K. Chesterton eloquently said:
“The place where babies are born, where men die,
where the drama of mortal life is acted, is not an office or a shop or a
bureau. It is something much smaller in size and much larger in scope. And
while nobody would be such a fool as to pretend that it is the only place where
people should work, or even the only place where women should work, it has a
character of unity and universality that is not found in any of the fragmentary
experiences of the division of labour.”
Home, by
its nature, foreshadows heaven. Pope Saint John Paul II’s final words in
this life were “Let me go to the house of the Father.” He wanted to
go home – to the home that all of us are willed by God to go
to, even if he allows our own will to lead us somewhere else. The home is
sometimes described as a “domestic church”, which, to be cautious, does not
excuse home birds from attending Sunday Mass in church!
Feminism hasn’t led women to happiness, just to
more searching, grasping, transitioning, with the next best thing around the
corner. What they don’t know is that no career, string of lovers, exotic
trips to Bali, or Louis Vuitton handbags will fill this gap.
What happens, then, when you have generations of
people that have wilfully killed their own children through abortion?
The Medievals were against abortion because it takes an innocent life, but
also because they knew it was mortally damaging to the human soul. It isn’t
just a child that dies in an abortion, but something in the mother and the
father dies as well.
As St. Thomas
Aquinas said, bonum est diffusivum sui, “the good spreads itself
out”. The opposite is also true: evil spreads itself out. This grave evil has
reached into every area of familial life.
This doesn’t absolve them of their crimes, but at
least helps us to understand how those entrusted with the care of so many souls
could respond with gross malfeasance. When some women can view the destruction
of their children as a social rite of passage to join the “sisterhood,” it
isn’t too far of a leap to see that bishops could abandon their spiritual
children to join the “brotherhood.”
“There are two ways of getting home,” Chesterton
explained, “One of them is to stay there. The other is to walk round the whole
world till we come back to the same place.”
We are a culture that needs to reclaim the home,
having looked the world over for happiness. Radical feminists, although they
have looked high and low, still have “that ache that cannot be defined.” Their
restless hearts are a God ache, which will remain until they make their way
back Home again.
No comments:
Post a Comment