Mary in Vatican II
Thanks to the Council
Fathers, Mariology and Ecclesiology were both renewed and more deeply expounded.
They showed in a magnificent way from the sources that Mariology in its
entirety was first thought of and established by the Fathers as Ecclesiology:
the Church is virgin and mother, she was conceived without sin and bears the
burden of history, she suffers and yet is taken up into heaven. Very slowly
there developed later the notion that the Church is anticipated in Mary. She
is personified in Mary and that, vice versa, Mary is not an isolated
individual closed in on herself, but carries within her the whole mystery of
the Church. The person is not closed individualistically nor is the community
understood as a collectivity in an impersonal way: both inseparably overlap.
This already applies to the woman in the Book of Revelation, as she appears
in chapter 12: it is not right to limit this figure exclusively and
individualistically to Mary, because in her we contemplate together the whole
People of God, the old and new Israel, which suffers and is fruitful in
suffering; nor is it right to exclude from this image Mary, the Mother of the
Redeemer. The virgin of Nazareth symbolizes Israel bereft of human sustenance
and dependent entirely on God. Thus the overlapping of individual and community,
as we find it in the New Testament, anticipates the identification of Mary
and the Church that was gradually developed in the theology of the Fathers
and finally taken up by the Council. The fact that the two were later
separated, that Mary was seen as an individual filled with privileges and
therefore infinitely beyond our reach where the Church in turn [was seen] in
an impersonal and purely institutional manner, has caused equal damage to
both Mariology and Ecclesiology. But if we want to understand the Church and
Mary properly, we must go back to the time before this fracture, in order to
understand the supra-individual nature of the person and the
supra-institutional nature of the community, precisely where person and
community are taken back to their origins, grounded in the power of the Lord,
the new Adam. The Marian vision of the Church and the ecclesial,
salvation-historical vision of Mary take us back ultimately to Christ and to
the Triune God, because it is here that we find revealed what holiness means,
what is God's dwelling in man and in the world, what we should understand by
the "eschatological" tension of the Church. Thus it is only the
chapter on Mary that leads Conciliar Ecclesiology to its fulfilment and brings us back to its Christological and Trinitarian
starting point. Read “Lumen Gentium”, Chapter VIII: The
Blessed Virgin Mary, Mother of God in the Mystery of Christ and the Church
Bishop Joseph Ratzinger (later Pope Benedict
XVI) very aptly chose a text from St. Ambrose: "So stand on the firm
ground of your heart! What standing means, the Apostle taught us, Moses wrote
it: 'The place on which you stand is holy ground'. No one stands except the
one who stands firm in the faith ... and yet another word is written: 'But
you, stand firm with me'. You stand firm with me, if you stand in the Church.
The Church is holy ground on which we must stand.... So stand firm, stand in
the Church, stand there, where I want to appear to you. There I will stay
beside you. Where the Church is, there is the stronghold of your heart. On
the Church are laid the foundations of your soul. Indeed I appeared to you in
the Church as once in the burning bush. You are the bush, I am the fire. Like
the fire in the bush I am in your flesh. I am fire to enlighten you; to burn
away the thorns of your sins, to give you the favour of my grace".
|
No comments:
Post a Comment