Monday, July 27, 2015

TODAY'S CHALLENGE

                                                                             TODAY’S CHALLENGE                                                                                                                                                             

“Questions gather people together, while answers divide”, says Eric-Emmanuel Schmitt in one of his latest novels. That gives us a snapshot of Europe (and the world) that Pope Emeritus Benedict hoped to evangelise by his call to the “new evangelisation”. Yet the world is not secularised. There is a deep hunger for God. People do not look to Christianity alone but to all great religions. The young especially are interested in spirituality but not in religion. They are interested in God more than in the Church. They are greatly preoccupied by death. People describe themselves as religious and with a belief in the afterlife, especially among the young. But attendance at liturgies is continuing to drop. “Believing without belonging” is the order of the day.
Clearly a big challenge to the churches is how to remain in contact with the millions of people who look for God but do not come to church. At the centre of Christianity is community: we are gathered by the Lord around the altar. How can we attract the people to belong as well as to believe? The old Christendom has gone. Not only Europe that Emeritus Pope Benedict had called his church to evangelise but also the world has become the home of all faiths of the world.  The key question for the future of the world is whether these faiths will live together in peace or whether they will tear the world apart. Tensions between Christians and Muslims (or, rather, pseudo-Muslims) are escalating. The so-called “Islamic State”, professing to uphold the strictest interpretation of the Koran, offers no quarter to adherents of other faiths. A stark challenge, indeed.  We Christians can bring peace because we are able to understand the role of faith in the lives of other believers other than atheists. In 1989 France was split over the controversy over Muslim girls wearing headscarves to school. It was Christian leaders who understood why it mattered to them, people like the Archbishop of Marseilles and the Archbishop of Canterbury. We Christians should dialogue with the Muslims; they are our brethren in Christ. After all, if the Muslim girls could not wear their scarves, then should Catholic nuns be allowed to wear veils in school?
Christianity first made Europe into Christendom. Now our challenge is how to help Europe and the world flourish as the home of many faiths.
The end of the 20th century saw the collapse of the grand master narratives. Fascism, Communism, and even, to some extent, capitalism, gave human beings the road map to paradise, and crucified millions on the way. Auschwitz has become a place of pilgrimage itself, to remind us what happens when we impose road maps on human beings.
Christianity itself does not impose an ideology. We have no more idea than anyone else what will happen in a 100 or 1,000 years. But Christianity invites us to set out on a journey and offers a glimpse of the goal. The God we worship is the God of Exodus. We Christians should accompany people on their pilgrimages, in their search for the good, the true and the beautiful. Our Christian Theology tells us that these values are meant for all human beings in their proper cultural settings. “The immense importance of a culture marked by faith cannot be overlooked; before the onslaught of contemporary secularism an evangelical culture, for all its limits, has many more resources than the mere sum total of believers. An evangelical popular culture contains values of faith and solidarity capable of encouraging the development of a more just and believing society, and possesses a particular wisdom which ought to be gratefully acknowledged” (Pope Francis, Evangelii Gaudium, no.68).




                                                                               


Friday, July 24, 2015

TRANSCENDENT LORD

                                                          TRANSCENDENT LORD
                                    6 August: Feast of the Transfiguration of Jesus Christ                                      

“Lord, it is good to be here”

High above Jerusalem, on Mt. Tabor, Jesus was transformed and transfigured. His human body, suffused with divinity, was a dazzling spectacle. How infinitely splendid Jesus must have appeared during his glorious transfiguration, outshining a million suns in the divine glory that was properly his. The Old Testament figures of Moses and Elijah appeared by his side, absorbed in conversation with him. By the transfiguration the old dispensation was swept up into the new. The three apostles, Peter, James and John, would be the leaders of the New Testament community, centred on the Son. The voice of the Father, “listen to him”, bore witness to his Son, the chosen, the fulfilment of his promises of old and the pledge of life and hope for the future. The transfiguration of the Lord was charged with promise.
Jesus’ three disciples were bedazzled and ecstatic in their wonderment, privileged, as they were to glimpse for a moment his transcendent state as he prayed to his Father. Peter hardly knew what to say. His words came tumbling out, the best he could find in his wonder and awe at what he saw and heard: “Master, how good it is for us to be here.” Peter confused but desiring to capture the glory for keeps, suggested pitching separate tents for Jesus, Moses, and Elijah. It was not to be. But others have since built the tabernacle that he never built for Jesus. The place is still remembered, still visited, a hallowed spot for prayer and worship by countless pilgrims.
For what happened there is what we have surely found, though perhaps less vividly than Peter, in our own lives. If we look back through our experience, if we take into account moments that have been rare but none the less real; if we remember how we have felt and at times still feel, we find something very near to what Peter felt.  We have known moment of transfiguration. And the truth is it is likely we can find no better words than Peter found, inadequate though they may be, to express what the moment has meant. The words give no explanation, they attempt no description. There is no time and need for such things  -  they only come later. The words are simply and solely an immediate response to what at the time could neither be questioned nor denied. “How good it is for us to be here,” said Peter, and meant it with all his heart.
This experience runs through the Bible like a golden thread. Ultimately it is what the Bible witnesses to amidst all that might seem to deny the presence of God. It is repeated again and again in the Old Testament, and nowhere more vividly than in the story of Jacob in the wilderness and on the run from his involvement in a mean and wretched deceit. In that desolate place he finds his loneliness broken through by an experience of which he can only say, as much as Peter said, “Surely, the Lord is in this place, and I knew it not.”
But Peter and his fellows could not prolong their peak experience. They had to realise that even though they saw “the Beloved Son”, pointed out by the Father, in the glory that was natural to him, that beautiful Son would not get away with glory. He would descend Mt. Tabor only to ascend Mt. Calvary. That’s the kind of God we have come to know  -  a God whose glory is spelled out in wounds, painful cries, darkness, and death. A God pretty much like we are; worse off than we are. The Bible story is about how God makes himself known and about his dealings with us. His presence is realised in the here and now of human life. Jesus stayed with that human life, was wholly involved in it. In him that life was transformed. In him that life was transformed and transfigured by a transfusion of the divine. And on Mt. Tabor Peter saw it and knew it: “Master, it is so good for us to be here.”
Those words have come so often in the various circumstances of each one’s life. The moments of certainty, when there could be neither question nor denial, have been rare. But the response we have felt at those moments has spilt over into a growing awareness, a kind of discerning, of the activity of God in our lives and in the lives of those who have touched ours. And in some ways, in between the certainties there come the doubts. For the God who comes to make himself known in the here and now of human life has so much to contend with, as he did even in the time of Christ. And that is true in the Church and all human endeavours. We are all awkward customers, plagued by our own follies and by the very many difficulties of being human in a world that runs to so much of inhumanity. We are not easy to work with or to work through, though that is God’s loving purpose in our lives. It is important to handle each experience  -  peak, poetic and prosaic  -  to the best our ability. We may have to practise more patience, strive that much harder, reach inside our selves for a little more strength, muster a little more faith in God and ourselves. Like Peter’s and his fellows’, our discipleship is limited. And yet we can experience the inner peace of those who know they gave their all. We shall be better, not bitter, knowing that in God’s presence we did our best. So we can say, and with all others who bear witness to the work of God in the midst of us, with thankfulness and wonder:
“Lord, it is good to be here.”




Tuesday, July 21, 2015

DO MUSLIMS AND CHRISTIAN BOTH BELIEVE IN JESUS CHRIST

DO MUSLIMS BOTH BELIEVE IN JESUS CHRIST ?


Muslims are quick to emphasize that they, too, believe in Jesus. Their claim is correct. After all, the Quran alludes to Jesus in a favorable light several times (e.g., Surah 3:45-51; 5:110; 21:91; et al.). But this claim is misleading, since it fails to own up to the fact that Christianity and Islam are in hopeless contradiction with each other regarding the most crucial contention of New Testament Christianity: the divinity of Christ. On this solitary point, Islam and Christianity, the Bible and the Quran, can never agree. This disagreement is of such momentous import and great magnitude as to make the inexorable incompatibility permanent.
You see, while the Quran speaks favorably of Jesus as a prophet of God, it vehemently denounces the deity of Christ. For example, consider Surah 18:1-5 (as translated by Muslim scholar Mohammed Pickthall)—
Praise be to Allah Who hath revealed the Scripture unto His slave…to give warning of stern punishment from Him…and to warn those who say: Allah hath chosen a son, (A thing) whereof they have no knowledge, nor (had) their fathers. Dreadful is the word that cometh out of their mouths. They speak naught but a lie.
And read Surah 19:88-93—
And they say: The Beneficent hath taken unto Himself a son. Assuredly ye utter a disastrous thing, whereby almost the heavens are torn, and the earth is split asunder and the mountains fall in ruins, that ye ascribe unto the Beneficent a son, when it is not meet for (the Majesty of) the Beneficent that He should choose a son. There is none in the heavens and the earth but cometh unto the Beneficient as a slave.
Or Surah 23:91—
Allah hath not chosen any son, nor is there any God along with Him (also 25:2; et al.).
These references demonstrate that the Quran depicts Jesus as a mere man—a prophet like Muhammad—who was created by God like all other created beings (Surah 5:75; cf. 42:9,13,21). Indeed, when Jesus is compared to any of the prophets (listed as Abraham, Ishmael, Isaac, and Jacob), Allah is represented as stating: “We make no distinction between any of them” (Surah 2:136; 3:84). Though the Quran seems to accept the notion of the virgin conception (Surah 21:91), to attribute divinity to Jesus, or to assign to Jesus equal rank with God, is to utter a “dreadful” and “disastrous” thing—to formulate “nothing but a lie”!
Here, indeed, is the number one conflict between Islam and Christianity—the deity, person, and redemptive role of Christ. If Christ is Who the Bible represents Him to be, then Islam and the Quran are completely fictitious. If Jesus Christ is Who the Quran represents Him to be, then Christianity is baseless and blasphemous. On this point alone, these two religions cannever achieve harmony. But the New Testament is very, very clear: the heart, core, and soul of the Christian religion is allegiance to Jesus Christ as God, Lord, and Savior. Jesus identified Himself as the “I AM” of the Old Testament (John 8:58; cf. 20:28-31). In Colossians, Paul forcefully affirmed regarding Jesus—
He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For by Him all things were created that are in heaven and that are on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or principalities or powers. All things were created through Him and for Him. And He is before all things, and in Him all things consist (1:15-17). For in Him dwells all the fullness of the Godhead bodily (2:9).
Such depictions of Jesus are frequent in the New Testament. Jesus was certainly a prophet, as the Quran affirms (Surah 4:163); but Jesus was not just a prophet. He was God in the flesh. In fact, oral confession of the deity of Christ is prerequisite to becoming a Christian (Romans 10:9-10). This singular point makes Christianity and Islam forever incompatible. One must be a Christian to be saved (John 14:6; Acts 4:12), and yet one cannot be a Christian without believing in, and verbally confessing, the deity of Christ, and then being immersed into Christ (Romans 6:1-4; Galatians 3:27). The Bible declares that Jesus was the final revelation of God to man (Hebrews 1:1-3). There have been no others.




Friday, July 10, 2015

LEGALISM AND THE BIBLE


Legalism and the Bible
 The word “legalism” does not occur in the Bible. It is a term Christians use to describe a doctrinal position emphasizing a system of rules and regulations for achieving both salvation and spiritual growth. Legalists believe in and demand a strict literal adherence to rules and regulations. Doctrinally, it is a position essentially opposed to grace. Those who hold a legalistic position often fail to see the real purpose for law, especially the purpose of the Old Testament law of Moses, which is to be our “schoolmaster” or “tutor” to bring us to Christ (Galatians 3:24).

Even true believers can be legalistic. We are instructed, rather, to be gracious to one another: “Accept him whose faith is weak, without passing judgment on disputable matters” (Romans 14:1). Sadly, there are those who feel so strongly about non-essential doctrines that they will run others out of their fellowship, not even allowing the expression of another viewpoint. That, too, is legalism. Many legalistic believers today make the error of demanding unqualified adherence to their own biblical interpretations and even to their own traditions. For example, there are those who feel that to be spiritual one must simply avoid tobacco, alcoholic beverages, dancing, movies, etc. The truth is that avoiding these things is no guarantee of spirituality.

The apostle Paul warns us of legalism in Colossians 2:20-23: “Since you died with Christ to the basic principles of this world, why, as though you still belonged to it, do you submit to its rules: ‘Do not handle! Do not taste! Do not touch!’? These are all destined to perish with use, because they are based on human commands and teachings. Such regulations indeed have an appearance of wisdom, with their self-imposed worship, their false humility and their harsh treatment of the body, but they lack any value in restraining sensual indulgence.” Legalists may appear to be righteous and spiritual, but legalism ultimately fails to accomplish God’s purposes because it is an outward performance instead of an inward change.

To avoid falling into the trap of legalism, we can start by holding fast to the words of the apostle John, “For the law was given through Moses; grace and truth came through Jesus Christ” (John 1:17) and remembering to be gracious, especially to our brothers and sisters in Christ. “Who are you to judge someone else's servant? To his own master he stands or falls. And he will stand, for the Lord is able to make him stand” (Romans 14:4). “You, then, why do you judge your brother? Or why do you look down on your brother? For we will all stand before God's judgment seat” (Romans 14:10).

A word of caution is necessary here. While we need to be gracious to one another and tolerant of disagreement over disputable matters, we cannot accept heresy. We are exhorted to contend for the faith that was once for all entrusted to the saints (Jude 3). If we remember these guidelines and apply them in love and mercy, we will be safe from both legalism and heresy. “Dear friends, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world” (1 John 4:1).

Thursday, July 2, 2015

THOMAS, APOSTLE OF INDIA

THOMAS, APOSTLE OF INDIA

            Tradition tells us that Thomas, one of the twelve apostles of Jesus, after evangelising other parts of the East, finally came to India. He evangelised many parts of this country, especially the South and, it is claimed, certain parts of present-day Pakistan.  At the end he received the martyr’s crown at Mylapore. In India, his feastday is a solemnity.  ‘Solemnity’ is a big word, usually reserved for the Feasts of the Lord, not the feats of the Saints. So how did Thomas sneak into this honour reserved for the Lord? Can any canonised do-gooder be foisted on to the Lord’s domain? Well, if you look more closely you’ll understand that there wouldn’t be a Thomas unless there was a Jesus. Were it not for Jesus, Thomas would have lived and died in Palestine and no one would have coined the expression “doubting Thomas.”
It is in St. John’s Gospel that Thomas emerges as a personality. There are three scenes in John’s Gospel where we meet with Thomas the apostle.
Scene one:             Jesus is at work across the Jordan away from Jerusalem. Martha sends word that Lazarus, her brother and Jesus’ friend is ill. Two days after receiving the news, Jesus decides to go to Lazarus, who by then is dead. The disciples are jittery about going to Jerusalem where hatred and enmity towards Jesus has been growing; they’d rather not take the risk. But Thomas speaks up: “let us go that we may die with him.” To share fully in the life and perils of Christ: that is what Thomas is ready to embrace.
Scene two:   the discourse after the Last Supper. Jesus has been telling the apostles about his departure from this world, about his return to the Father, to prepare a place for them. This sort of talk went above their heads; so Thomas, speaking on their behalf, asks: “Lord, we do not know where you are going, so how can we know the way?”  Jesus gives the never-before-heard reply: “I am the Way, I am the Truth and I am the Life.” We owe to Thomas this mysterious but beautiful revelation of who Jesus is. Through Jesus Christ the Father takes possession of us. Thomas’ question not merely manifests his ignorance, but also his searching and probing mind, his desire for clarity and comprehension.
Scene three is the Gospel about the ‘doubting Thomas’. It gives us a glimpse of two sides of Thomas. First, the unbelieving Thomas will submit only after some physical assessment of the body of Jesus. (Could our friend have been an MBBS?) Jesus takes on Tom on the latter’s terms and invites him to do the physical. Which brings us to the other side: Thomas the unbeliever is demolished and in his place Thomas the humble proclaimer: “My Lord and my God!” This is the most beautiful confession of faith ever recorded in human literature. Jesus replies with that last and most reassuring beatitude: “Blessed are they who have not seen and yet believe.”

In all these three scenes Thomas is presented as a man of loyalty and courage. He is ready to share the lot of Christ. Yet, like the other apostles, he lacks understanding. Not one of them really understood Jesus. His whole person, his words and deeds are from and to the Father. So when Jesus speaks of his departure to the Father, they are nonplussed. Thomas has the courage to confess his ignorance and ask for clarification. When he’s in doubt, he says so; he can show himself different from the others. He even puts conditions to Christ. And when the light of truth shines on him he is humble and receptive. We often speak of the doubting Thomas; but we oughtn’t to forget the loyal and courageous Thomas; the questioning and searching Thomas; the open, humble and adoring Thomas. And is there anything to stop us internalising these qualities for ourselves and our countrymen? We thank God for giving Thomas as our apostle, and pray for our country in a special way. We shall pray that our nation, known for its relentless search for God from time immemorial, may come to recognise and accept Jesus Christ as their Saviour.

Monday, June 15, 2015

FAITH WE NEED

THE FAITH WE NEED

The Human Dimension

            Faith is believing. We often believe in something or, more painfully, in somebody who might turn out to be quite different from what we believed him to be. Faith is often credulous: we are taken in by our wishes, by our fantasies, above all, by our yearnings, by our longing for something or someone who will satisfy us to the very depths. The law courts and especially the divorce courts tell the tale too often. We are often let down, and the more often it happens, the faster our faith disappears. The person who has let us down has lost his credibility with us, as we say. Faith means acceptance: acceptance of someone’s words, for instance, and behind the words, the person we accept. Faith also means that other people can accept our words and us. It leaves us vulnerable. It leaves us open to the possibility of betrayal.

            Yet, without faith, it is impossible to live. Every time, for example, we accept a cheque we include the possibility that it will turn out to be a dud that will bounce. And yet our whole financial system depends on faith or trust. When we marry we do so in the firm belief that our spouse is faithful. We don’t expect scientific proof for such ordinary and highly-esteemed beliefs in life. A chemist does not demand that his dinner be laboratory-tested for poison before he eats it. The detective does not consider his wife’s fidelity an open question until she has been placed under round-the-clock surveillance. The traveller does not wonder where his plane is going until he has mastered the techniques of navigation and scrutinised the data of the pilot. In these and a thousand more important matters daily life proceeds by a faith the rejection of which is considered nothing short of insanity.
            At the deepest level we put our trust in life itself. We believe that life is fundamentally good. Our faith discovers goodness at the heart of things. The result, though, in many cases, is cynicism, the attitude that is summed up in the adage, “Blessed is he who expects nothing for he shall not be disappointed.” For despite our disappointments we go on believing. Why? Because, basically, in order to survive at all we must have an almost animal love of life. It is a basic commitment to life, to survival, to the sheer insistence on going on. It is a belief that the basic hunger, the huge yearning inside all of us be satisfied.     

Faith in Jesus Christ

            The Christian can build on this because the Resurrection of Jesus Christ supports his basic faith in life. Christ’s Resurrection is our own recurring resurrection. The Resurrection of Jesus can tell us something when life gets us down. Jesus was killed by cruel men but he was raised by a loving God. The Resurrection tells us that when the worst happens the best happens as well. It tells us that our basic belief in life is quite right. Our deepest instincts are pushing us in the right direction, pushing us into the ever-open future: not a pie in the sky, but eternal life now. That is what all the simplicity and subtlety of the Christian creed is about. We don’t just recite it; we surrender ourselves to it.

            Thus, for the Christian, faith is centred on Jesus Christ. Faith involves a special kind of perception which discovers a special kind of meaning in certain experiences. The meaning of these experiences entails awareness and some understanding of God. The experiences may be of different types: intellectual, emotional, vivid, cumulative, social, solitary, delightful, terrifying, contrived and spontaneous. However, religious experience is not itself faith. But faith is a response to religious experience, that accepts as valid the awareness and understanding of God that the experience engenders. It is God who provides what is religiously experienced and who enables human beings to experience it religiously. He makes it possible to find meaning in religious experience and to assent to that meaning as true. But the assent itself is an act of human freedom, though enabled by God.
            The essential act of specifically Christian faith is an assent to the discovery of divine meaning in Jesus Christ, i.e. Jesus Christ as the personalised venue of divine salvific purpose, present and acting in us. For the average Christian believer, the experience of Jesus Christ, at least initially, appears to be a second hand perception: the perception of Jesus about whom one is told by others. Christian revelation, after all, is transmitted by tradition. The written Bible is the outstanding and normative example of tradition, though not exclusively. By virtue of his experience of Jesus Christ, the Christian by faith assents to the Gospel. That is, the good news that in Jesus Christ God is revealed as invincibly loving and as rescuing human beings from every kind of evil that they do or suffer in order to lead them into perfect union with a goodness that is absolute and eternal. To be drawn towards Christianity is to suspect that this is true. To begin to be a Christian is to believe that this is the most important of all truths. And to live as a Christian is to make the supreme value of this truth the ultimate standard of human freedom.

Man under the obedience of faith

            In his very being man is confronted with the will of the Creator. There is an inescapable decision to be for or against God. For his own salvation and the good of his fellowmen man is bound to the obedience of faith; to care for and nourish his faith is a lifelong task. The Christian life is a symbiosis with the Lord (cf. Rom 6, 8; Col 2, 13), a progressive death to sin and a renewal of life (Col 2, 12; 2 Cor 4, 10-11). What a Christian has acquired once and for all he must develop and perfect (cf. Rom 6, 5-14). The “new man” (Eph 2, 15; 4, 24; 2 Cor 5, 17; Col 6, 15) is characterised by the loss of autonomy. He is no more the source of his own life, the author of his own actions. Gal 2, 20, “and it is no longer I who live, but Christ who lives in me. And the life I now lives in the flesh, I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me.” Hence, the Christian’s moral life is an extension, prolongation and unfolding of the life of Christ. Christians are authentic children of God even here on earth, possessing by grace the same divine nature as their Father in heaven (cf. Eph 1, 5; Gal 4, 5). The Christian cannot and need not reproduce Christ’s deeds materially, but he must adopt Christ’s manner of thinking and judging (1 Cor 2, 16, “but we have the mind of Christ”), be inspired with his sentiments, copy his virtues, imitate his charity, and have the same filial piety towards the Father (cf. Rom 15, 5; Phil 2, 5).
The Faith of Mary:  i. “Porta Fidei”, pp. 22 – 23 (read)                         ii. When the Faith of God entered into Mary, that very faith empowered her to answer her great “yes” with a complete hope for the future. She would be faithful, strong and reliable. The first among the disciples, the one whose discipleship never fails, the woman who does not deny, does not betray, does not leave her child and run away. Mary is the virgin daughter of Israel who bears a Son, who says to the God who calls her to carry God’s own Son and birth Him in our world. She is the lowly handmaid who will be called “blessed” by succeeding generations, she has the Faith. Her will is to do “the command of the eternal God” (Rom 16, 26), even if it means walking the hard road from Nazareth of Galillee to the place of the Skull outside Jerusalem. From the Maid of Nazareth she will become the “woman n the hill”, the woman of faith who replied to the angel Gabriel: “Be it done unto me according to your word.”                                           The function of Faith is nowhere more vividly exemplified than in the response of Mary to the sufferings of her Son Jesus. Jesus’ mother was a daughter of the nation Judah. She imbibed the innocent suppositions of her people. She understood that she was to conceive and bear the Messiah. But where were the proofs?  Her Son showed no sign of being Israel’s saviour; rather, she saw him heading for disaster, seemingly unable to avert his fate. How could a disgraced, crucified man be the Messiah? The answer is faith. Only through faith and steadfast loyalty was she able to surrender her conceptions of the Messiah.
After the Ascension of Jesus, the Beloved disciple John took Mary into his own. We too take her home and give her pride of place, even though we humbly admit that our house is not always in order. The brokenness of sin, the evil of destructive attitudes towards the neighbour, the lusts of the flesh - all these destroy our homes and make them unfit for our Blessed Mother to live in. Yet today we shall offer our brokenness to Mary, the Mother of health, trusting that she will transform them into something beautiful for God.
Health does not mean physical fitness and muscular power; rather, in the mind of Mary it means the capacity of surrendering our whole selves to God whatever be the state of health, whether we be on the bed of pain, or handicapped by injury or ailment or mental torture, we can offer ourselves to God through Mary. That is health. And those who do so are in very good health.


Prayer:

         O gracious Lady, beloved Mother of God and our loving Mother, from where shall we learn Faith if not from you, sweet Maiden who said “Yes” to God’s invitation to carry the Saviour in your virginal womb, and nurse him at your breast? You followed him with a mother’s concern right through his ministry, accompanied him on his cross-laden ascent to Calvary, and became the sorrowing woman on the hill. Through faith and steadfast loyalty you treasured the mysteries of Jesus in your heart, and have made them ours, so that whatever happened to you and Jesus must happen to us: a holy life and happy death in God and community in him forever. Amen.





















Friday, June 5, 2015

RULE BOOK RELIGION

Rule-book Religion
Healthy disagreements are usually necessary for successful dialogue, but there is something really sad about an intransigent attitude where members of the same family, whose name and logo is love, struggle to sit down and just talk to each other in a normal, trusting way. 

And there is, indeed, so much to discuss. There are priests and parishioners, for instance, who are aware of the pastoral power of general absolution, of freedom in choosing appropriate Eucharistic Prayers, of sharing Holy Communion, on occasion, with Christians other than Catholics in the “state of grace”, of respect and understanding in discussions around gay marriage, of the urgent and obvious need to ordain married men, and of many other disputed occasions of grace. Ideally, a central role of the institutional Church would be to provide an open forum for such pressing and life-giving dialogue. 
Pope Francis has made clear his desire for open discussion. People need a welcoming forum for freedom of expression. This has long been a contentious issue. Sixty years ago Karl Rahner’s pamphlet “Free Speech in the Church” attempted to help Catholics move beyond the norm of passive acceptance. He was trying to encourage dialogue, to clarify the vital difference between unchangeable doctrine and negotiable, developing teachings.

How utterly disappointing it is, in a world dissected by terrorism, genocide, avarice and poverty, for members of the community called “God’s People” to be so reluctant about talking to each other regarding those matters that touch hearts so deeply. We ask the Putins and Obamas of this world to sit and share at the same negotiating table, yet in our own family we struggle to trust each other, to incarnate new love, to build community. 

This is the saddest state of affairs. People wonder whether we clerics have ever really read the Gospels with open hearts, whether we have gazed on God’s Earth and its peoples with utter tenderness, whether we have ever experienced within us the healing power of divine mercy. There is a kind of clericalism that dries up our hearts, that drains the stream of God’s unconditional compassion. Too many of us still play the clerical game. 

Out of fear, out of a misplaced loyalty, out of ignorance of God’s fragile fleshiness, we blindly continue to rule from the book. But we are “people of the flesh” before we are “people of the book”. Pope Francis contrasted “laboratory beliefs” with the experience of falling in love with God, and reserves his harshest criticism for lip-serving hypocrisy. Thinkers such as psychotherapist Carl Jung and Jewish philosopher Martin Buber have held that nothing blocks God’s love like book-religion does. 

After all, for what purpose other than the kindling and nourishing of true love in the human heart does the Church exist? Did Jesus not make it utterly clear that this was his one passion in life and in death? Too often we turn the hard face towards other faiths and denominations, excluding in our certainties those who are “different”, over-defending our “one, true Church” status whereas, in a radical vulnerability, we are called to touch human hearts with the spiritual power of powerlessness. 

We forget that every written and spoken word in our homilies, catechesis and parish ministry must first present the love story of a God who daily lives and dies for us with an extravagant longing? This is the vibrant passion that millions of concerned Catholics long for, and sorely miss; this is why they want to talk to us. It is the experience of God’s compassion they seek, not more information about it. 

Creeds and catechisms have their necessary places, but always at the service of a trusting surrender to the incarnate Word. Pure Christianity has no purpose other than the revealing and nourishing of humanity’s intimacy with God. Maybe today the Holy Spirit is inspiring people with a new confidence in their God-given gifts and authority.

These are the newly empowered hearts that will restore a spiritual energy to an anxious institution. In his A Different Journey, Fr Brian D’Arcy wrote: “The only choice for the Church is another radical Reformation. The deeply ingrained evil of clericalism destroyed the credibility of our beautiful Church. Because of it, one important point has been missed – the Church will be saved by its laity, or it will not be saved at all.”

In the meantime we remember that we are engaged in unpredictable mystery, that no person or group can ever have all the wisdom, that the challenge of paradox will mark every step of the way, that the shadow of the cross will fall everywhere, and that the Holy Spirit is free and invincible. And so we try to hold the tensions, but to do so in humble, loving dialogue. For Christians, and especially during these urgent years, there is no other way.